ABSTRACT
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has served as a stark reminder of the importance of foundational public health training for all physicians. However, the most effective way to incorporate these concepts into undergraduate medical education remains unclear. Here, we characterize the literature regarding the effectiveness of public health integration into undergraduate medical education in North America. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, and Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) in accordance with preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines for North American peer-reviewed literature, published from 01/01/2000 to 30/08/2021, that described outcomes of integrating public health training within an undergraduate medical curriculum. Results were qualitatively synthesized into key themes. A total of 38 studies, involving interventions across 43 medical schools, were included. Studies reported on a combination of public (n=13), global (n=9), population (n=9), community (n=6), and epidemiological (n=1) health interventions, and either implemented one-off workshops, electives, or international experiences (n=19); a longitudinal theme or long-term enrichment pathway (n=14); or a case-based learning curriculum (n=8). The majority (81.5%, 31/38) of integrations were self-described as successful and, of studies reporting on feasibility, most (94.1%, 16/17) were indicated as feasible. The definition of what constituted such success, however, was unclear. Innovative examples included the use of simulation workshops and mobile-optimized media content. Key challenges were noted, however, in securing adequate funding and buy-in from administrative leadership. Robust community partnerships and iterative cycles of implementation of the intervention were critical factors to success. In summary, foundational public health components can be effectively integrated into medical school curricula and would benefit from adequate resourcing, innovation, community partnerships, and continuous improvement.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The increased scrutiny on public health brought upon by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic provides a strong impetus for a renewal of public health systems. This paper seeks to understand priorities of public health decision-makers for reforms to public health financing, organization, interventions, and workforce. METHODS: We used an online 3-round real-time Delphi method of reaching consensus on priorities for public health systems reform. Participants were recruited among individuals holding senior roles in Canadian public health institutions, ministries of health and regional health authorities. In Round 1, participants were asked to rate 9 propositions related to public health financing, organization, workforce, and interventions. Participants were also asked to contribute up to three further ideas in relation to these topics in open-ended format. In Rounds 2 and 3, participants re-appraised their ratings in the view of the group's ratings in the previous round. RESULTS: Eighty-six public health senior decision-makers from various public health organizations across Canada were invited to participate. Of these, 25/86 completed Round 1 (29% response rate), 19/25 completed Round 2 (76% retention rate) and 18/19 completed Round 3 (95% retention rate). Consensus (defined as more than 70% of importance rating) was achieved for 6 out of 9 propositions at the end of the third round. In only one case, the consensus was that the proposition was not important. Proposition rated consensually important relate to targeted public health budget, time frame for spending this budget, and the specialization of public health structures. Both interventions related and not related to the COVID-19 pandemic were judged important. Open-ended comments further highlighted priorities for renewal in public health governance and public health information management systems. CONCLUSION: Consensus emerged rapidly among Canadian public health decision-makers on prioritizing public health budget and time frame for spending. Ensuring that public health services beyond COVID-19 and communicable disease are maintained and enhanced is also of central importance. Future research shall explore potential trade-offs between these priorities.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Public Health , Humans , Delphi Technique , Healthcare Financing , Pandemics , Canada , COVID-19/epidemiology , WorkforceABSTRACT
The extent to which power, resources, and responsibilities for public health are centralized or decentralized within a jurisdiction and how public health functions are integrated or coordinated with health care services may shape pandemic responses. However, little is known about the impacts of centralization and integration on public health system responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. We examine how public health leaders perceive centralization and integration facilitated and impeded effective COVID-19 responses in three Canadian provinces. We conducted a comparative case study involving semi-structured interviews with 58 public health system leaders in three Canadian provinces with varying degrees of centralization and integration. Greater public health system centralization and integration was seen by public health leaders to facilitate more rapidly initiated and well-coordinated provincial COVID-19 responses. Decentralization may have enabled locally tailored responses in the context of limited provincial leadership. Opacity in provincial decision-making processes, jurisdictional ambiguity impacting Indigenous communities, and ineffectual public health investments were impediments across jurisdictions and thus appear to be less impacted by centralization and integration. Our study generates novel insights about potential structural facilitators and impediments of effective COVID-19 pandemic responses during the second year of the pandemic. Findings highlight key areas for future research to inform system design that support leaders to manage large-scale public health emergencies.
ABSTRACT
There have been longstanding calls for public health systems transformations in many countries, including Canada. Core to these calls has been strengthening performance measurement. While advancements have been made in performance measurement for certain sectors of the health care system (primarily focused on acute and primary health care), effective use of indicators for measuring public health systems performance are lacking. This study describes the current state, anticipated challenges, and future directions in the development and implementation of a public health performance measurement system for Canada. We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with public health leaders (n = 9) between July and August 2021. Public health leaders included researchers, government staff, and former medical officers of health who were purposively selected due to their expertise and experience with performance measurement with relevance to public health systems in Canada. Thematic analysis included both a deductive approach for themes consistent with the conceptual framework and an inductive approach to allow new themes to emerge from the data. Conceptual, methodological, contextual, and infrastructure challenges were highlighted by participants in designing a performance measurement system for public health. Specifically, six major themes evolved that encompass 1) the mission and purpose of public health systems, including challenges inherent in measuring the functions and services of public health;2) the macro context, including the impacts of chronic underinvestment and one-time funding injections on the ability to sustain a measurement system;3) the organizational structure/governance of public health systems including multiple forms across Canada and underdevelopment of information technology systems;4) accountability approaches to performance measurement and management;and 5) timing and unobservability in public health indicators. These challenges require dedicated investment, strong leadership, and political will from the federal and provincial/territorial governments. Unprecedented attention on public health due to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has highlighted opportunities for system improvements, such as addressing the lack of a performance measurement system. This study provides actionable knowledge on conceptual, methodological, contextual, and infrastructure challenges needed to design and build a pan-Canadian performance measurement system for public health.